DisplayPort 2.1 might be a huge deal for PC gaming in 2023

DisplayPort 2.1 became a much bigger talking point than expected when AMD revealed its upcoming RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT GPUs. This is DisplayPort’s latest standard, a revision to the 2.0 spec released in 2019, and it’s a natural inclusion for next-gen GPUs. There’s just one problem – Nvidia’s behemoth RTX 4090 still uses DisplayPort 1.4a.

While the 1.4A spec is still more than enough for most people, the inclusion of DisplayPort 2.1 gives AMD an edge in this generation. No, I’m not here to sell you on 8K gaming – in some parts of the world, 8K may not even be possible – but for a crowd of competitive gamers and VR enthusiasts, DisplayPort 2.1 could be a big shift.

An update four years in the making

ports on the RTX 3050 graphics card.
The EVGA RTX 3050 XC Black includes three DisplayPort connections and a single HDMI. James Roach/Digital Trends

VESA, the company that defines and certifies the DisplayPort standard, released DisplayPort 2.1 in October 2022. It usually takes years for products to make their way to market that support a new standard, but DisplayPort 2.1 isn’t that new. It’s a refresh to DisplayPort 2.0, which launched in 2019, and a massive improvement over DisplayPort 1.4 that we’ve seen since 2016.

Like any new connection, it’s all about bandwidth. DisplayPort 1.4a, which you’ll find on all the latest graphics cards short of the Intel Arc A770 and A750, as well as AMD’s upcoming RX 7900 XTX, is up to 25.92 Gbps of maximum data rate. DisplayPort 2.1 goes up to 77.37Gbps (theoretical bandwidth is higher, if you see different numbers, but this is the actual data rate possible over the cable). If you run some, admittedly complicated, math, you’ll find that the required data rate for 4K at 120Hz with HDR is 32.27Gbps – higher than what DisplayPort 1.4a is capable of.

Also Read :  Government energy support schemes need more detail

Monitors like the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 support 4K at 240Hz with just DisplayPort 1.4a, so what gives? DisplayPort (and HDMI now) uses Display Stream Compression (DSC) to reduce the amount of data required. DSC is not mathematically lossless, but it is visually lossless. And it can reduce the required data with a ratio of 3:1, with the number from 32.27Gbps to 10.76Gbps. That’s great, and DSC is the only reason DisplayPort 1.4a hasn’t been kicked to the curb already.

Cable management on the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8.
James Roach/Digital Trends

The problem is that the limitations of DisplayPort 1.4a start to crop up, even with DSC enabled. A theoretical 4K monitor at 360Hz would not be able to run at its full refresh rate, even with DSC compressing by 3:1 (the required data rate is 36.54 Gbps, in case you were wondering). And higher color depths for HDR add even more bandwidth requirements, as do higher refresh rates and resolutions.

A 4K 360Hz monitor may sound crazy now, but we have hardware capable of handling such a display. AMD claimed 295 fps at 4K in Apex Legends and 355 fps in Overwatch 2. In addition, the RTX 4090 can push above 300 fps at 4K in rainbow six siege, And the frame generation capabilities of DLSS 3 and the upcoming FSR 3 are sure to challenge the position of ​​the 4K at maximum 240 Hz we currently have on gaming monitors.

Also Read :  Tech’s Terrible Week, in 10 Charts

Most people don’t need that extra refresher course, but let’s be honest; Most people don’t need to spend $1,600 (or even $1,000) on a GPU.

We have the hardware

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 GPU.
James Roach/Digital Trends

Strangely, we don’t wait for hardware to use monitors. We are waiting for monitors to show new hardware. Samsung has already teased its “8K” Odyssey Neo G9 for CES this year – for the record, it’s not true 8K, but rather two 4K displays side-by-side in the 32:9 aspect ratio – and we expect to see at least A handful of 8K gaming monitors will be on display at the show alongside Samsung’s display.

The display is also a good touchstone. Assuming Samsung wants to keep a 240Hz refresh rate like the current version has, you’re looking at a data rate above 45Gbps with HDR on (36.19Gbps ​​with HDR off), and that’s with 3:1 compression. This is all theoretical at the moment, we need to wait until we see this display and other 8K options, but the numbers suggest that the RTX 4090 may not be able to drive them due to its DisplayPort 1.4a connection (at least in full refresh) Of course, DisplayPort is backwards compatible).

A slide featuring Samsung's first 8K ultrawide monitor.

There is no need to limit the conversation to 8K or super high refresh rates at 4K. OLED TVs masquerading as gaming monitors are becoming increasingly popular, and they could see huge benefits from 5K and 6K resolutions. As I saw with the LG UltraGear 48 OLED, the pixel density needs to be higher for such a large screen so close to your face. DisplayPort 1.4a can drive 5K and 6K with DSC, but not at refresh rates above 120Hz and not at higher HDR color depths.

Also Read :  These gadgets will take you to a new world of gaming from your bed

Data rate capping is also shown in VR. The Pimax Crystal, which is currently on a Kickstarter campaign, should require around 29Gbps ​​of data with DSC at 3:1 based on the specs. This is what DisplayPort 1.4a is capable of, but it reaches its limit.

From large form factor displays to VR headsets to higher refresh rates at 4K, DisplayPort 1.4a is starting to reach its full capacity. If both AMD and Nvidia stuck with DisplayPort 1.4a, it wouldn’t be a big deal. Display manufacturers would adapt to the capabilities of what is now in the market. But AMD is opening the floodgates with its new GPUs.

An important distinction, but not a selling point

The RX 7900 XTX graphics card with its die.

Of all the things to base a buying decision on, the DisplayPort standard should be very far down the list. We still need to see how AMD’s new GPUs perform, what features like FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) 3.0 will bring, and if pushing past the barrier gaming monitors now even makes sense.

But this is the trend, and the difference between DisplayPort 1.4a and 2.1 may become more significant much faster than we expected – at least for a high-end class of gamers who want to experiment with bleeding-edge tech.

Editor’s recommendations


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

Back to top button