EXPLAINER: Where does student loan forgiveness stand?

Federal Court in St. Louis created an alternative to President Joe Biden’s plan to give millions of borrowers up to $20,000 each in federal student loan forgiveness..

The court on Monday approved the preliminary injunction stop the program in one of the few difficult problems for the health care system.

With the forgiveness closing, millions of borrowers are beginning to wonder if they will get debt relief at all. The fate of the plan will ultimately end up in the Supreme Court.

Here is where it stands:


The debt forgiveness plan announced in August would eliminate $10,000 in student loan debt for those with less than $125,000 or families with less than $250,000. Pell Grant recipients, who are often found to have greater financial need, will receive an additional $10,000 in forgiveness.

College students are eligible if their loans are discharged before July 1. The plan makes 43 million borrowers eligible for some form of forgiveness, with 20 million who can get their debt completely eliminated, according to management.

The Congressional Budget Office said the program would cost about $400 billion over the next three years.

The White House said that 26 million people have applied for health care coverage, and 16 million people have already been approved.


Also Read :  Volunteers of America Eastern Washington will add behavioral health services with $4 million federal grant

The decision on Monday was made by a three-judge panel from the 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, which was decided by the Republican-led states of Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Arkansas and South Carolina to block loan forgiveness.

The decision by the commission made by three Republican representatives – one appointed by President George W. Bush and two by President Donald Trump – continues to hold until the matter is resolved in court. In the past, the court was temporarily suspended.

Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, a Republican, said in a statement that the decision “sees that the attempt to forgive more than $400 billion in student loans will result in economic damage that cannot be reversed.”

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the administration has confidence in its legislation for student health care.

Jean-Pierre said “The President will continue to fight against the illegal charges by Republican leaders and special interests and will not stop fighting to support those who do jobs and the average American,” Jean-Pierre said.


On Thursday, United States District Judge Mark Pittman – President Donald Trump’s chief of staff in Fort Worth, Texas – ruled that the program was an effort for Congress to enact legislation. bridge.. The administration immediately filed a notice to appeal.

Also Read :  US uses farmers markets to foster ties at bases in Japan

Pittman said the Higher Education for Students Act of 2003, commonly known as the HEROES Act, did not authorize the loan forgiveness program.

The law allows the secretary of education to waive or change the terms of federal student loans in times of war or national emergency. Officials said the COVID-19 pandemic has created a national crisis.

But Pittman said such a large program would require federal approval.

The plan has faced other legal challenges. In October, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied the appeal by the Wisconsin taxpayers. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, finding that they had no legal standing, or standing, to bring the case.


Pittman’s decision against the constitutional debate used to justify Biden’s plan. In the past, the White House has been able to fend off legal challenges in lawsuits by tweaking the terms of the program.

One lawsuit argued that the automatic write-off of debt would cause borrowers to pay more tax in states that levy a tax on written-off debt. Administrators responded by allowing borrowers to opt out. Another lawsuit alleges that Biden’s plan would hurt financial institutions that make money off certain types of federal student loans. The White House responded by removing the loan from the plan.

However, Texas law states that the HEROES Act does not allow for the discharge of large debts. The law allows the Department of Education to make general changes during national emergencies, but the judge ruled that it is not clear that the cancellation of the debt is the appropriate response to COVID-19, noting that Biden has recently been declared infected.

Also Read :  Seoul Halloween: Crowd crush kills at least 151 in South Korea's Itaewon district


The legal situation is complicated because of the many lawsuits. It is likely that the Texas case and lawsuits filed by six states will be filed with the Supreme Court. Before it gets to that level, the 5th and 8th Circuit appeals courts – both controlled by judges – will rule separately on each case.

The case before the 8th Circuit Court could end up in the Supreme Court soon now that the panel has granted a ruling from six GOP-led states.

Likewise, the administration has indicated that it will appeal the decision in Texas. If the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals is asked to block Pittman’s decision pending an appeal, the loser could turn to the Supreme Court.

However, the arbitral tribunal will not issue a final decision on the validity, but whether it can go forward during the competition.

At this time, Biden managed to not accept any more applications for student loan forgiveness.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Articles

Back to top button